Déjá vus are actually well explained in the latest New Scientist, very cool stuff :)
I think you might want to highlight JQuery 1.3.2 and DOM instead of JQuery 1.2.6 tho as the performanace improved dramatically since then. But I just don't get what you are saying by saying that libraries (not talking about JQuery only, cos I am only a user) are not optimized for IE. Any libraries will have a huge amount of lines that are dedicated to IE, cos IE just can't use standards properly. Unless of course as usual I don't get it cos the translation doesn't go well lol If it wasn't for IE the number of check in libraries would be smaller and libraries would probably be faster lol On Apr 2, 11:05 am, Andrea Giammarchi <[email protected]> wrote: > dejavou ... I am not blaming any library and obviously it is not possible to > match manual tasks speed but Internet Explorer is not optimized at all, > that's the point. > > That TaskSpeed is performing truly common operation like remove, append, > prepend, before, after, creation, etc ... and results against other > libraries ( except for Prototype ) are clear in my blog > post:http://webreflection.blogspot.com/2009/04/taskspeed-dom-vs-libraries.... > > Here a summary of Internet Explorer results: > > Internet Explorer 6 > ------------------------ > library | ms > ------------------------ > DOM *3966* > Dojo 1.2.3 22750 > plugd-a (Dojo) 24189 > Dojo 1.3.0 24249 > jQuery 1.3.2 44314 > MooTools 1.2.1 69346 > jQuery 1.2.6 *104407* > > Internet Explorer 7 > ------------------------ > library | ms > ------------------------ > DOM *612* > Dojo 1.2.3 3641 > plugd-a (Dojo) 3748 > Dojo 1.3.0 3861 > jQuery 1.3.2 5031 > MooTools 1.2.1 7658 > jQuery 1.2.6 *10468* > > Internet Explorer 8 > ------------------------ > library | ms > ------------------------ > DOM *499* > Dojo 1.3.0 2327 > plugd-a (Dojo) 2455 > Dojo 1.2.3 2922 > jQuery 1.3.2 3170 > MooTools 1.2.1 5876 > jQuery 1.2.6 *7049* > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Gilles <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It would be good to see DOM speed results compare to other libraries > > and see which libraries comes the closest to it. But I would never > > expect any library to match it on all tests. But then again that > > TaskSpeed test only take into consideration few basics tests and not > > the overall performance of akll the functionalities within a library. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
