Stephen - I didn't test while to see if it was more efficient, I just didn't like the idea of having two break; statements, and was wondering if it would be possible to do it with just one or none. This way felt "cleaner" to me, somehow. But I'm a little weird (I'll freely admit) :D
On Jun 11, 3:39 am, "stephb...@googlemail.com" <stephb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Nice idea. My version would do that by replacing line 13 with: > > result = arguments[i+1].call(this, test); > > Is there a good reason for using 'while'? Is it more efficient? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
