>> For example s.datTypes = ["jsonp","xml"] means: get an object (a string
in that case) over jsonp >> that'll get parsed as xml (and this is actually
working and being unit tested ;))
I'm actually not sure what you're trying to illustrate here. I'm seeing an
object with a property called "dataTypes" that's an array, with two values
................
Literally, all I did was add:
json = type === "json" || !type && ct && ct.indexOf("json") >= 0,
and...
if ( json || type === "json" ) {
To the httpData() method in ajax.js
Like I said...it's totally ripped off from the xml content-type handling
behaviour. The part i didn't include was the invalid JSON error handling
Rick
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Julian Aubourg <aubourg.jul...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I'm a bit curious as to how (and why) you intend to implement this, seeing
> as the ajax revamping I've been working on uses an array of dataTypes.
>
> For example s.datTypes = ["jsonp","xml"] means: get an object (a string in
> that case) over jsonp that'll get parsed as xml (and this is actually
> working and being unit tested ;))
>
> If your intention is to give a list of accepted dataTypes, I'd rather go
> for a string of the form "json | xml" if you get my idea.
>
> 2009/12/23 webbiedave <webbied...@websiteguard.com>
>
> I'll rewrite so dataType can also accept an array. That way there's
>> explicitness. I'll report back after some real world usage.
>>
>>
>> On Dec 23, 3:56 am, Tobias Hoffmann <smilingt...@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 5:16 AM, John Resig <jere...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > Is there an open ticket on this? If so I don't see a reason not to
>> land it.
>> >
>> > Well, if there is no safe json decoder (i.e. just eval()) it's not
>> > immediatly clear to me, that I really want this.
>> > Yes, all the other jscripts also come from the server and are thus
>> somehow
>> > equally trustworthy.
>> > And the Content-Type on the HTTP header can not easily be spoofed. But I
>> > don't want jquery to evaluate some
>> > unsafe user content (e.g. CMS, Guestbook, ... ) that wasn't ever meant
>> to be
>> > json ...
>> >
>> > Tobias
>> >
>> > > Could we change the $.ajax() function to treat the server's response
>> > > > as json if dataType is unspecified and the response content-type is
>> > > > "application/json"?
>> >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > Dave
>>
>> --
>>
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "jQuery Development" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<jquery-dev%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en.
>>
>>
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "jQuery Development" group.
> To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<jquery-dev%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en.
