>> For example s.datTypes = ["jsonp","xml"] means: get an object (a string in that case) over jsonp >> that'll get parsed as xml (and this is actually working and being unit tested ;))
I'm actually not sure what you're trying to illustrate here. I'm seeing an object with a property called "dataTypes" that's an array, with two values ................ Literally, all I did was add: json = type === "json" || !type && ct && ct.indexOf("json") >= 0, and... if ( json || type === "json" ) { To the httpData() method in ajax.js Like I said...it's totally ripped off from the xml content-type handling behaviour. The part i didn't include was the invalid JSON error handling Rick On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Julian Aubourg <aubourg.jul...@gmail.com>wrote: > I'm a bit curious as to how (and why) you intend to implement this, seeing > as the ajax revamping I've been working on uses an array of dataTypes. > > For example s.datTypes = ["jsonp","xml"] means: get an object (a string in > that case) over jsonp that'll get parsed as xml (and this is actually > working and being unit tested ;)) > > If your intention is to give a list of accepted dataTypes, I'd rather go > for a string of the form "json | xml" if you get my idea. > > 2009/12/23 webbiedave <webbied...@websiteguard.com> > > I'll rewrite so dataType can also accept an array. That way there's >> explicitness. I'll report back after some real world usage. >> >> >> On Dec 23, 3:56 am, Tobias Hoffmann <smilingt...@googlemail.com> >> wrote: >> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 5:16 AM, John Resig <jere...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > Is there an open ticket on this? If so I don't see a reason not to >> land it. >> > >> > Well, if there is no safe json decoder (i.e. just eval()) it's not >> > immediatly clear to me, that I really want this. >> > Yes, all the other jscripts also come from the server and are thus >> somehow >> > equally trustworthy. >> > And the Content-Type on the HTTP header can not easily be spoofed. But I >> > don't want jquery to evaluate some >> > unsafe user content (e.g. CMS, Guestbook, ... ) that wasn't ever meant >> to be >> > json ... >> > >> > Tobias >> > >> > > Could we change the $.ajax() function to treat the server's response >> > > > as json if dataType is unspecified and the response content-type is >> > > > "application/json"? >> > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > Dave >> >> -- >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "jQuery Development" group. >> To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<jquery-dev%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en. >> >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jQuery Development" group. > To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<jquery-dev%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en.