It's all fine and dandy, except I wasn't replying to you Rick. 2009/12/24 Rick Waldron <waldron.r...@gmail.com>
> It doesn't make a difference to me if my one line gets to ride with 1.4 or > not. The 'why' is because it was requested and I replied that I had a 1.3.2 > copy that I had hacked to do this... John mentioned filing a ticket. > > As for my not providing unit test cases, I can simply reply: 9 months real > world usage in every application that I've written with jquery have proven, > to me, that it works. > > The commit I made to my fork is based on the most recent version of > ajax.js in the master on github. > > The 'how'... Its shockingly simple: it copies the same behaviour as the xml > detection. Nothing special. > > Rick > > -- Sent from my Palm Prē > > ------------------------------ > Julian Aubourg wrote: > > I'm a bit curious as to how (and why) you intend to implement this, seeing > as the ajax revamping I've been working on uses an array of dataTypes. > > For example s.datTypes = ["jsonp","xml"] means: get an object (a string in > that case) over jsonp that'll get parsed as xml (and this is actually > working and being unit tested ;)) > > If your intention is to give a list of accepted dataTypes, I'd rather go > for a string of the form "json | xml" if you get my idea. > > 2009/12/23 webbiedave <webbied...@websiteguard.com> > >> I'll rewrite so dataType can also accept an array. That way there's >> explicitness. I'll report back after some real world usage. >> >> >> On Dec 23, 3:56 am, Tobias Hoffmann <smilingt...@googlemail.com> >> wrote: >> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 5:16 AM, John Resig <jere...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > Is there an open ticket on this? If so I don't see a reason not to >> land it. >> > >> > Well, if there is no safe json decoder (i.e. just eval()) it's not >> > immediatly clear to me, that I really want this. >> > Yes, all the other jscripts also come from the server and are thus >> somehow >> > equally trustworthy. >> > And the Content-Type on the HTTP header can not easily be spoofed. But I >> > don't want jquery to evaluate some >> > unsafe user content (e.g. CMS, Guestbook, ... ) that wasn't ever meant >> to be >> > json ... >> > >> > Tobias >> > >> > > Could we change the $.ajax() function to treat the server's response >> > > > as json if dataType is unspecified and the response content-type is >> > > > "application/json"? >> > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > Dave >> >> -- >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "jQuery Development" group. >> To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<jquery-dev%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en. >> >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jQuery Development" group. > To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<jquery-dev%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jQuery Development" group. > To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<jquery-dev%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en.
