Regardless, I'm leaning towards the dataType: "auto" approach as it's easy to use/implement and affords enough control.
Well, so, first, I translated the dataType to "auto" when it was null/undefined in my rewriting (because I hate messy/undefined values). But that's no biggy. Second, auto seems like the weirdest thing ever to me used like it is here. So dataType==null and dataType=="auto" act the same for xml but not for script & json? Seems completely inconsistant to me. If a coder does not want auto conversion, then he simply specifies a dataType (namely "text"). You just have to document it. But, please, do not introduce a behavior that will act differentely for xml than it does for any other dataType deduced from content type headers. 2009/12/26 webbiedave <webbied...@websiteguard.com> > I was referring solely to the "bitwise or" style. Regardless, I'm > leaning towards the dataType: "auto" approach as it's easy to use/ > implement and affords enough control. > > > Julian Aubourg wrote: > > > As for string expressions not being in the calling style of jQuery... > > well... I really disagree here, since jQuery has expression parsed parsed > > pretty much everywhere ;) > > > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jQuery Development" group. > To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<jquery-dev%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en.
