I totally agree and this was part of the discussion my team had with them. If lowsrc was still supported this may not be a problem, but I am sure their are alternatives.
On 2/14/08, Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Interesting… I've never thought of specifying image > > size in em's. The problem of image degradation would > > still be an issue, I'm sure, since an image may be > > specified for display in em's in a browser, but would still start > > its life in pixels (if it's not a vector graphic), unlike text, which > isn't an > > enlargement of a static entity, but is created anew > > in larger dimensions. > > > > Something to think about, however… > > > > Rick > > > > > > > > > > > > *From:* jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On > Behalf Of *Benjamin Sterling > *Sent:* Thursday, February 14, 2008 10:30 PM > *To:* jquery-en@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* [jQuery] Re: a small accessibility rant > > > > Rick, I have not gotten into it too much because it has not been a > requirement, having just the alt/title tags is usually enough, but there has > been talk over at the EPA accessiblity testing group to require setting > width and height of images using EM instead of PX. This is so that if a > user bumps up the text size (ctrl +) that the image will get bigger at the > same ratio. Of course the text would need to be in EM also. This is > something that I personally have not gotten into yet, but it may become a > requirement for one of my contracts. > > On 2/14/08, *Rick Faircloth* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What does your friend do about images? Enlarging the text would be a > start, > but if I were having great difficulty viewing the screen, I would want a > solution that allows me to view images, as well. > > > Rick > > > > -- Benjamin Sterling http://www.KenzoMedia.com http://www.KenzoHosting.com http://www.benjaminsterling.com
