Hi Michael,

Ouch. That's quite a difference. I thought about the join vs
concatenate performance difference in IE, but didn't remember it could
be that large. I take that one, I was being displiscent.

cheers,
- ricardo

On Feb 6, 1:25 am, "Michael Geary" <m...@mg.to> wrote:
> "...there is not much room for improvement left."
>
> You just know that when you say that, someone will come along with a 20x-40x
> improvement. ;-)
>
> http://mg.to/test/loop1.html
>
> http://mg.to/test/loop2.html
>
> Try them in IE, where the performance is the worst and matters the most.
>
> On my test machine, the first one runs about 6.3 seconds and the second one
> about 0.13 seconds.
>
> -Mike
>
> > From: Ricardo Tomasi
>
> > Concatenating into a string is already much faster than
> > appending in each loop, there is not much room for
> > improvement left. What you can do improve user experience
> > though is split that into a recursive function over a
> > setTimeout, so that the browser doesn't freeze and you can
> > display a nice loading animation.
>
> > On Feb 5, 5:03 pm, James <james.gp....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I need tips on optimizing a large DOM insert to lessen the
> > "freeze" on
> > > the browser.
>
> > > Scenario:
> > > I receive a large amount of JSON 'data' through AJAX from a
> > database
> > > (sorted the way I want viewed), and loop through them to
> > add to a JS
> > > string, and insert that chunk of string into a tbody of a
> > table. Then,
> > > I run a plug-in that formats the table (with pagination, etc.).
> > > Simplified sample code:
>
> > > var html = '';
> > > $.each(data, function(i, row) {
> > >      html += '<tr><td>data from json</td></tr>';});
>
> > > $("tbody").append(html);
> > > $("table").formatTable();
>
> > > formatTable() requires that the table has to be "completed"
> > before it
> > > can be executed.
> > > Is there any way I can optimize this better? I think I've read
> > > somewhere that making a string too long is not good, but I've also
> > > read that updating the DOM on each iteration is even worst.
>
> > > Any advice would be appreciated!

Reply via email to