On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 9:11:04 PM UTC+10, Tony Kelman wrote: > > Yes, I suspect it will, but it may take a week or two for Elliot Saba > (@staticfloat) to get to it. I can't imagine any of the backports we've > made would present any problems to updating the Ubuntu package in the > releases PPA, but Elliot's been a bit busy recently and there are enough > things breaking on master to keep up with to make sure all the nightlies > work too. >
Ok, just noting that the PPA has completely missed 0.3.9. > > > On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 3:05:21 AM UTC-4, ele...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 1:47:51 PM UTC+10, Tony Kelman wrote: >>> >>> Hello all! The latest bugfix release of the 0.3.x Julia line has been >>> released. Binaries are available from the usual place >>> <http://julialang.org/downloads/>, >>> >> >> Is the ubuntu packages ppa linked from here going to be updated, it is >> still at 0.3.8? >> >> Cheers >> Lex >> >> >> >>> and as is typical with such things, please report all issues to either >>> the issue tracker <https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues>, or email >>> the julia-users list. >>> >>> This is a bugfix release, primarily concerned with rebuilding the >>> Windows binaries against an updated libstdc++ ABI in order for packages >>> using WinRPM to work again. If you are on Windows and have hit "Provider >>> PackageManager failed to satisfy dependency ..." errors, please try this >>> version and hopefully it will be fixed. To see all other bugs fixed since >>> 0.3.9, see this commit log >>> <https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/compare/v0.3.9...v0.3.10>. >>> >>> This is a recommended upgrade for anyone using any of the previous 0.3.x >>> releases, and should act as a drop-in replacement for any of the 0.3.x >>> line. We would like to get feedback if someone has a working program that >>> breaks after this upgrade. >>> >> >>> -Tony >>> >>>
