On Friday, June 26, 2015 at 7:04:48 AM UTC+10, Elliot Saba wrote: > > Yes, that's my fault. 0.3.10 is making its way through the buildd servers > as we speak. > -E > > Thanks for making the PPA, maybe you need some more elves :)
Cheers Lex > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:52 AM, <ele...@gmail.com <javascript:>> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 9:11:04 PM UTC+10, Tony Kelman wrote: >>> >>> Yes, I suspect it will, but it may take a week or two for Elliot Saba >>> (@staticfloat) to get to it. I can't imagine any of the backports we've >>> made would present any problems to updating the Ubuntu package in the >>> releases PPA, but Elliot's been a bit busy recently and there are enough >>> things breaking on master to keep up with to make sure all the nightlies >>> work too. >>> >> >> Ok, just noting that the PPA has completely missed 0.3.9. >> >> >>> >>> >>> On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 3:05:21 AM UTC-4, ele...@gmail.com wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 1:47:51 PM UTC+10, Tony Kelman wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello all! The latest bugfix release of the 0.3.x Julia line has been >>>>> released. Binaries are available from the usual place >>>>> <http://julialang.org/downloads/>, >>>>> >>>> >>>> Is the ubuntu packages ppa linked from here going to be updated, it is >>>> still at 0.3.8? >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> Lex >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> and as is typical with such things, please report all issues to either >>>>> the issue tracker <https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues>, or >>>>> email the julia-users list. >>>>> >>>>> This is a bugfix release, primarily concerned with rebuilding the >>>>> Windows binaries against an updated libstdc++ ABI in order for packages >>>>> using WinRPM to work again. If you are on Windows and have hit "Provider >>>>> PackageManager failed to satisfy dependency ..." errors, please try this >>>>> version and hopefully it will be fixed. To see all other bugs fixed since >>>>> 0.3.9, see this commit log >>>>> <https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/compare/v0.3.9...v0.3.10>. >>>>> >>>>> This is a recommended upgrade for anyone using any of the previous >>>>> 0.3.x releases, and should act as a drop-in replacement for any of the >>>>> 0.3.x line. We would like to get feedback if someone has a working >>>>> program >>>>> that breaks after this upgrade. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> -Tony >>>>> >>>>> >
