Yes, that's my fault.  0.3.10 is making its way through the buildd servers
as we speak.
-E

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:52 AM, <ele...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 9:11:04 PM UTC+10, Tony Kelman wrote:
>>
>> Yes, I suspect it will, but it may take a week or two for Elliot Saba
>> (@staticfloat) to get to it. I can't imagine any of the backports we've
>> made would present any problems to updating the Ubuntu package in the
>> releases PPA, but Elliot's been a bit busy recently and there are enough
>> things breaking on master to keep up with to make sure all the nightlies
>> work too.
>>
>
> Ok, just noting that the PPA has completely missed 0.3.9.
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 3:05:21 AM UTC-4, ele...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 1:47:51 PM UTC+10, Tony Kelman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello all! The latest bugfix release of the 0.3.x Julia line has been
>>>> released. Binaries are available from the usual place
>>>> <http://julialang.org/downloads/>,
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is the ubuntu packages ppa linked from here going to be updated, it is
>>> still at 0.3.8?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Lex
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> and as is typical with such things, please report all issues to either
>>>> the issue tracker <https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues>, or
>>>> email the julia-users list.
>>>>
>>>> This is a bugfix release, primarily concerned with rebuilding the
>>>> Windows binaries against an updated libstdc++ ABI in order for packages
>>>> using WinRPM to work again. If you are on Windows and have hit "Provider
>>>> PackageManager failed to satisfy dependency ..." errors, please try this
>>>> version and hopefully it will be fixed. To see all other bugs fixed since
>>>> 0.3.9, see this commit log
>>>> <https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/compare/v0.3.9...v0.3.10>.
>>>>
>>>> This is a recommended upgrade for anyone using any of the previous
>>>> 0.3.x releases, and should act as a drop-in replacement for any of the
>>>> 0.3.x line. We would like to get feedback if someone has a working program
>>>> that breaks after this upgrade.
>>>>
>>>
>>>> -Tony
>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to