Hello Larry,

as in the further discussion just named the main problema are (for example I just have to work with point layers with only a heigh attribute but with 1 million points; but also e.g. 300,000 points are enough):
- (re)drawing of the points
- strongly restricted or impossible operation (e.g. deleting some points/vertices after marking them; e.g. copying hundreds or a few thousand in a new layer to have layer with lesser points)
Very often OJ hangs on and I have to restart it.
I use such point layers for creating a digital terrain maps.

Kindly regards
Arnd

Larry Becker schrieb:
Hi Arnd,

I haven't worked with large point datasets much. What it is exactly that is slow? Is it redraw time? Or perhaps the particular operation that you are doing?

I know that point layers do not benefit from the recent decimation optimization, so they take longer to draw than equivalent polygons and polyline layers. I think Michaël tried a point decimation optimization, but wasn't satisfied with the results.

regards,
Larry Becker

On 10/1/07, *Stefan Steiniger* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    mhm
    from my point of view it is both OJ and JRE. It would be probably
    better
    when the points are stored and processes in a database.

    stefan

    Arnd Kielhorn schrieb:
    > Hello,
    >
    > yes I know, first of all OJ is a GIS for vector data. But the
    > functionality is also very good for point datasets. But working with
    > great point datasets (more 500,000 points) bring problems with the
    > memory and the garbage collector works not satisfied. Every
    command take
    > a lot of time or could not carried out. (CPU P4 2.4 GHz, 1 GB RAM)
    > Is it only a thing of the JRE or also from OJ?
    > So, it is useful to know if there is a chance to increase the
    > performence of OJ in this case and what could be the possible
    milestones
    > to reach this aim?
    > I am very eager to read everyones opion.
    >
    > Kindly regards
    > Arnd
    > _______________________________________________
    > jump-users mailing list
    > [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users
    >
    >
    _______________________________________________
    jump-users mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users
    <http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users>




--
http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
jump-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users

_______________________________________________
jump-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users

Reply via email to