Sebastian, you should be able to achieve what you want by using Virtual Switch Routing instance instead of VPLS routing instance.
you can confirgure a Virtual Switch instance with protocol VPLS in it , and create a bridge-domains to allow all vlans , that should allow you to be able to create a trunk in VPLS, and allowing all vlans HTH On 23 December 2011 15:18, Doug Hanks <dha...@juniper.net> wrote: > It's coming. > > On 12/22/11 8:04 AM, "Derick Winkworth" <dwinkwo...@att.net> wrote: > > > >I don't have the answer immediately for you, so I apologize. > > > >But I wanted to chime in with a "THIS IS WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT" comment. > > The MX is super flexible and has loads of features with respect to > >VLANs/BRIDGING/VPLS/PBB etc, but its confusing as shit and the > >documentation is not the greatest. > > > >There really ought to be an entire book *just* about this topic. Written > >in a tutorial fashion. Covering Q-in-Q, VPLS, PBB, VLAN tag > >manipulation, bridging features, etc. All on the MX specifically. It > >needs to cover the various encapsulation types, "family bridge", etc. > > > >The MX solution guide isn't making it happen. > > > >Still, I heart the MX immensely. Especially now that we are finally > >seeing quality code on it... or better quality code anyway. > > > >Derick Winkworth > >CCIE #15672 (RS, SP), JNCIE-M #721 > >http://packetpushers.net/author/dwinkworth/ > > > > > >________________________________ > > From: Sebastian Wiesinger <juniper-...@ml.karotte.org> > >To: Juniper NSP <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> > >Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 8:34 AM > >Subject: [j-nsp] MX VPLS Trunk with VLAN rewriting > > > >Hi, > > > >I'm trying to setup a VLPS "Trunk" (many VLANs - one VPLS instance) on > >MX960 (Trio MPC) where each site has different local VLAN-IDs which > >should be bridged over VPLS. > > > >Example: > > > > Site 1 ---- VPLS ---- Site 2 > >LAN1: vl100 vl10 vl200 > >LAN2: vl301 vl11 vl201 > > > > > >I did the following config: > > > >Site1: > >interfaces { > > ae2 { > > unit 100 { > > encapsulation vlan-vpls; > > vlan-id 100; > > input-vlan-map { > > swap; > > vlan-id 10; > > } > > output-vlan-map swap; > > } > > unit 301 { > > encapsulation vlan-vpls; > > vlan-id 301; > > input-vlan-map { > > swap; > > vlan-id 11; > > } > > output-vlan-map swap; > > } > >} > > > >routing-instances { > > test-service { > > instance-type vpls; > > vlan-id all; > > interface ae2.100; > > interface ae2.301; > > vrf-target target:65000:10003; > > protocols { > > vpls { > > no-tunnel-services; > > site local-ce { > > site-identifier 1; > > interface ae2.100; > > interface ae2.301; > > } > > mac-flush { > > any-interface; > > } > > } > > } > > } > >} > > > > > >Site2: > > > >interfaces { > > ae2 { > > unit 200 { > > encapsulation vlan-vpls; > > vlan-id 200; > > input-vlan-map { > > swap; > > vlan-id 10; > > } > > output-vlan-map swap; > > } > > unit 201 { > > encapsulation vlan-vpls; > > vlan-id 201; > > input-vlan-map { > > swap; > > vlan-id 11; > > } > > output-vlan-map swap; > > } > >} > > > >routing-instances { > > test-service { > > instance-type vpls; > > vlan-id all; > > interface ae2.200; > > interface ae2.201; > > vrf-target target:65000:10003; > > protocols { > > vpls { > > no-tunnel-services; > > site local-ce { > > site-identifier 2; > > interface ae2.200; > > interface ae2.201; > > } > > mac-flush { > > any-interface; > > } > > } > > } > > } > >} > > > > > >When I try to commit this config I get an error: > > > >[edit routing-instances test-service interface] > > 'ae2.100' > > interface with input/output vlan-maps cannot be added to a > >routing-instance with a vlan-id/vlan-tags configured > > > >JunOS version is 11.2R4 > > > >When I remove "vlan-id all" from the VPLS instance the config commits > >but no bridge is formed, the clients on each site cannot reach each > >other. > > > >Any idea what to do? Our Juniper consultant said it would be possible > >to do this. > > > >Regards > > > >Sebastian > > > >-- > >New GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A 9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 > >B9CE) > >Old GPG Key-ID: 0x76B79F20 (0x1B6034F476B79F20) > >'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE > >SCYTHE. > > -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant > >_______________________________________________ > >juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > >_______________________________________________ > >juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > -- Humair _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp