Am 23.07.2012 16:28, schrieb Per Granath: >> Am 23.07.2012 16:14, schrieb Per Granath: >>> Is there any reason why you are not running LDP-tunneling to/from R4/R8 >> and R10? >> >> This woule be a viable solution, but as mentioned per definition it is not >> allowed (or for a better term wanted) in this scenario to extend ldp beyond >> 4, 8 and 5 (not even via rsvp tunneling) routers 9, 3 and 10 are not allowed >> to >> run ldp on any interface. >> In a real world network i would probably consider ldp tunneling but this is >> more a "can it be done this way" scenario. >> > > R10 would need to run LDP only on lo0 ...
I know, but in this scenario any interface means any interface including lo0 :) or just to put it another way: no ldp process on router 10 regards Tobias _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
