Le 15/11/2013 17:10, Dave Curado a écrit : > > Hi Yham, > > Thanks for the map -- your situation is a lot more interesting than it > first appeared!
I agree! :-) > I'm guessing there may be some number of requirements and policy > decisions that went > into this. Without knowing all the back story, it makes it a little > tricky to say what would > be best solution. > > I realize I'm not answering the question you have asked, but I'm curious: > Is there a reason that the BR-1 and BR-2 routers can't be part of the > same > AS as the "Internal Internet with public ASN core"? That would seem > like a clean solution. > > If you can't do that, and you can't use private AS-es for the pair of > BR-1/BR-2 routers, then > when I look at your diagram, each BR-1/BR-2 pair *looks like* a single > AS to me; while they > are connected together through the MPLS network, that happens through > a different private AS. Maybe wrapping things up in a BGP confederation architecture? Thoughts? > > So, somewhat ironically, I'm back at my original message with my same > list of pros and cons. =-) mh > > HTHs, > Dave > > > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
