On 11/15/13 11:29 AM, Michael Hallgren wrote:
Le 15/11/2013 17:10, Dave Curado a écrit :
Hi Yham,
Thanks for the map -- your situation is a lot more interesting than it
first appeared!
I agree! :-)
I'm guessing there may be some number of requirements and policy
decisions that went
into this. Without knowing all the back story, it makes it a little
tricky to say what would
be best solution.
I realize I'm not answering the question you have asked, but I'm curious:
Is there a reason that the BR-1 and BR-2 routers can't be part of the
same
AS as the "Internal Internet with public ASN core"? That would seem
like a clean solution.
If you can't do that, and you can't use private AS-es for the pair of
BR-1/BR-2 routers, then
when I look at your diagram, each BR-1/BR-2 pair *looks like* a single
AS to me; while they
are connected together through the MPLS network, that happens through
a different private AS.
Maybe wrapping things up in a BGP confederation architecture? Thoughts?
Great idea!
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
