+1 for git in general - however, the apache git mirror has been working pretty well for me for local work/code review. So if the caveats you mention are significant enough then maybe we should stay on svn?
Joel On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Taylor Gautier <tgaut...@tagged.com>wrote: > I prefer git… > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Neha Narkhede <neha.narkh...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > +1 for moving to git. > > > > Thanks, > > Neha > > > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Chris Burroughs > > <chris.burrou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > It came up in the 0.7.2 thread that with the number of parallel > branches > > > git may be preferable to svn for our current and future workflow. I'd > > > like to gauge interest in possibly switching from svn to git. > > > > > > Currently INFRA can provide read/write git hosting at > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/. Repository list: > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf To summarise there are a few > > > caveats: > > > * Support is less polished than svn, and any problems may take longer > > > to fix. > > > * Someone from migrating projects ought to volunteer to assist INFRA > if > > > needed (I volunteer). > > >
