History is preserved, it *should* look more or less just like the current read/only git mirrors. I'll definitely circle back here with any other complications.
On 07/31/2012 12:08 PM, Jun Rao wrote: > Chris, > > Thanks for following up with this. Do we lose the commit history when > moving to git? If so, maybe it's better to wait until 0.8 is released. > > Jun > > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Chris Burroughs > <chris.burrou...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I was originally going to follow this was a [VOTE] thread, but most of >> the responses are a +1 anyway. I think we can do this and it will be a >> significant improvement. I'll follow up with INFRA this week. >> >> We don't have to do this, or do it now. So if anyone does have concerns >> please do speak up. >> >> On 07/26/2012 11:39 AM, Chris Burroughs wrote: >>> It came up in the 0.7.2 thread that with the number of parallel branches >>> git may be preferable to svn for our current and future workflow. I'd >>> like to gauge interest in possibly switching from svn to git. >>> >>> Currently INFRA can provide read/write git hosting at >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/. Repository list: >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf To summarise there are a few >>> caveats: >>> * Support is less polished than svn, and any problems may take longer >>> to fix. >>> * Someone from migrating projects ought to volunteer to assist INFRA if >>> needed (I volunteer). >> >
