I am +1 as well. -Jay
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Joel Koshy <jjkosh...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for git in general - however, the apache git mirror has been working > pretty well for me for local work/code review. So if the caveats you > mention are significant enough then maybe we should stay on svn? > > Joel > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Taylor Gautier <tgaut...@tagged.com > >wrote: > > > I prefer git… > > > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Neha Narkhede <neha.narkh...@gmail.com > > >wrote: > > > > > +1 for moving to git. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Neha > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Chris Burroughs > > > <chris.burrou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > It came up in the 0.7.2 thread that with the number of parallel > > branches > > > > git may be preferable to svn for our current and future workflow. > I'd > > > > like to gauge interest in possibly switching from svn to git. > > > > > > > > Currently INFRA can provide read/write git hosting at > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/. Repository list: > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf To summarise there are a few > > > > caveats: > > > > * Support is less polished than svn, and any problems may take > longer > > > > to fix. > > > > * Someone from migrating projects ought to volunteer to assist INFRA > > if > > > > needed (I volunteer). > > > > > >
