On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 9:44 AM Valorie Zimmerman <valorie.zimmer...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 1:48 AM Luigi Toscano <luigi.tosc...@tiscali.it> > wrote: >> >> Kai Uwe Broulik ha scritto: >> > Hi, >> > >> > > Here is my follow-up change recommendation based on feedback and >> > research: >> > > >> > > UNCONFIRMED -> REPORTED >> > > WONTFIX -> INTENTIONAL >> > > INVALID -> NOTABUG >> > >> > one issue I'm having with "REPORTED" is that it shows up as "REPO" in the >> > list >> > and can easily be confused with "REOP" for "REOPENED". Perhaps we need >> > something different for Reopened then. >> >> If we rename also that, we would have two bug names diverging from the other >> bug trackers, instead of just one. Moreover I find that there is no much to >> discuss on the appropriateness of REOPENED. >> I'd rather find an alternative for REPORTED, if this confusion is going to be >> an issue. >> >> -- >> Luigi > > > OPENED ?
Definitionally reported is definitely the right word to be using, but given that conflict/simiilarity between REPO/REOP I think opened is probably the best term we can get here. None of the synonyms for reported fit that's for sure. > > Valorie > -- > http://about.me/valoriez > > Cheers, Ben