On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 17:41, Ben Taylor <bentaylor.solx86 at gmail.com> wrote: > Does anyone see any value in tweaking the infrastructure such that: > > WDYT?
No, I see no value whatsoever in this idea. Can you provide a single other example in which the build system for a particular piece of software relies on a specific and non-portable filesystem feature ? Would it have been acceptable if SGI had baked in a hard dependency on XFS into the GLUT build system ? Here's another idea: restrict the QT builds to 10K RPM SATA drives. Not on 10K RPM SATA, no QT. Why ? Because it's faster than the 7200 RPM SATA. WDYT ? -- Stefan Teleman KDE e.V. stefan.teleman at gmail.com
