On Thursday 20 October 2005 04:31 pm, Mike O'Brien wrote: > Michael Nottebrock sez: > > ...And seriously consider upgrading your system to FreeBSD 5 or FreeBSD > > 6. > > ... > > > I really urge everybody on this list to move up > > to FreeBSD 5 or FreeBSD 6 now and spread the word to everybody who does > > not read this list as well: FreeBSD 4 support is definitely on the way > > out. > > I run -STABLE on my desktop because I run -STABLE on my servers. > -STABLE is advertised as "stable" and that's what I need, much more > than performance or new features. > > When -STABLE is retargeted
I have no problem with you running whatever you want to, and whatever is "stable" for you, but I do just want to note that -STABLE refers to RELENG_5 and has for quite a while. (Technically all the RELENG_x are called x-STABLE branches. You could run 3-STABLE, but if you say just -STABLE you mean RELENG_5. Soon it will mean RELENG_6.) I suppose there could be some disagreement with this because there's no cvs tag -STABLE to actually retarget, but this is certainly what it feels like from reading [EMAIL PROTECTED] -David -- "What's the good of having mastery over cosmic balance and knowing the secrets of fate if you can't blow something up?" -Terry Pratchett _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] http://freebsd.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
