Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 10:45:55AM -0500, Jason Wessel wrote:
>
>   
>> ----- Patch for consideration #1 -----
>> Moved weak definitions to kernel/kgdbarchlib.c to get rid of gcc-4.1 bug.
>>
>> http://kgdb.cvs.sourceforge.net/kgdb/kgdb-2/core-lite.patch?r1=1.125&r2=1.126&pathrev=MAIN
>>     
>
> If this is fixed in a current gcc-4.1 release, I'd be really against
> this.  Perhaps a compiler check in <linux/kgdb.h> with some good
> comments (gcc bug url and such) instead?
>
>   
I used gcc 4.1.1 for all my testing and did not see any issues, so I'll 
assume we do not have to merge this one.

> It might be worthing poking the LinuxSH list to see if anyone wants to
> step up and keep an eye on KGDB/SH.  I primarily did this port because I
> had the hardware and to try and prove it really was easy enough to add
> another arch, given an existing stub somewhere.  I no longer have the
> hardware I did this port on.
>
>   

Of course I am happy to put something in if you come up with something.

Thanks,
Jason.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Kgdb-bugreport mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport

Reply via email to