On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 11:02:55AM -0500, Jason Wessel wrote: > Pete/Piet Delaney wrote: > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >Hash: SHA1 > > > >gcc 4.1.1 is still a supported compiler by kernel.org; since we have > >what appears to be reasonable fix and it will prevent folks who happen > >to be using 4.1.1 from having weird problems it seems reasonable to > >apply the fix. > > > >I like to hear reasonable argument against including it. > > > > > Piet, > > I do not have any problem with the original patch from a technical > angle. What I do see is a problem is that the patch does not match > what so ever to the current tree. This means that perhaps some other > prior patch is missing, or there is a non-obvious fork that happened > somewhere.
That's the other thing. I kind of think that in my git tree I reworked things so that it simply wasn't a problem, possibly by just getting rid of all of the weak functions, and the number of them that were needed. I think it was the case that it was always: - The function used was the weak one. - The non-weak version was an "x86'ism" and the same on i386/x86_64/ia64 for just about everything. -- Tom Rini ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Kgdb-bugreport mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport
