On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:22:50PM -0700, Pete/Piet Delaney wrote:
>
> Adrian Bunk also thinks we likely don't need to worry about the
> weak bug in gcc-4.1; looks like your likely right that it's not
> worth messing with. Anyone compiling with gcc-4.1 is going to get
> a wanning message that the compile has a bug and isn't recommended.
I don't know what your specific problem is, but to avoid any
misunderstandings:
gcc 4.1.0 is a known bad compiler.
gcc 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 are perfectly good compilers (and do not generate
any such warning message), and most likely the most frequently used ones
today.
> - -piet
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Kgdb-bugreport mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport
