I've changed the subject to pursue a side question..

Joshua Penix wrote:
> On Jul 25, 2008, at 4:47 PM, James G. Sack (jim) wrote:
> 
>> Just wondering how many people here use raid on their home desktop
> 
> I do as a rule.  RAID1 on everything.  With the cost of hard drive
> storage as low as it is, it seems ridiculous to do otherwise.  Most
> corporate (Windows) PCs I purchase these days also come with RAID1 right
> out of the box.
> 
> In both of these cases, I'm talking about small drives (250-320GB for
> home, as low as 80GB for corp) in the RAID1.  They're only there for the
> OS and application load.  I keep my bulk media storage on a NAS that has
> its own RAID5 or RAID10 configuration and is kept in a closet.  I like
> to keep my desktops small and simple, not a 4-drive beast with a 600W
> power supply sitting under my desk.
> 
>> Then, for those who do (or know how they would-do), what partitioning do
>> you use -- a bunch (giving several mds), or one/few (possibly using lvm
>> on top)?
> 
> I believe the mds should map closely to the physical drives, and LVM
> should be responsible for the logical layout, so generally one huge md
> with LVM sitting on top.  The only exception to this might be a second
> small md for /boot to simplify bootloader configuration...

In the old days, boot had to be below the 1024-cylinder limit (or
something like that), but what is the advantage of a small boot
partition on current hardware and with today's bootloaders? Is there
really anything operational, or perhaps it might be just a convenience
-- say, for maintenance purposes?

>.. Also remember
> that swap needs to either be inside the LVM or on its own RAID set.
> 
>> Or maybe there's some neat stuff by dropping the ext3/lvm blinders?
> 
> I always like to leave myself some room.  I'll set up the volume group
> to take everything available, but then I'll configure the initial
> logical volumes to only add up to 50-80% of the available space.  That
> leaves me a pool for future expansion that I can use when a need
> arises.  Much easier on the brain than trying to guess how you'll be
> using partition space a year from now.
> 


-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to