Tracy R Reed wrote: > James G. Sack (jim) wrote: >> In the old days, boot had to be below the 1024-cylinder limit (or >> something like that), but what is the advantage of a small boot >> partition on current hardware and with today's bootloaders? Is there >> really anything operational, or perhaps it might be just a convenience >> -- say, for maintenance purposes? > > grub doesn't speak LVM so if you put /boot inside LVM you will have > problems. >
Oh, yeah. ..jim -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
