Good Info Brian? my plans were to mount it lower than the wing cells?. so I?m okay there? Also transferring to main tank but by 1/4? lines?.. then return overflow to one wing cell again via 1/4 ? Considering more volume under pump pressure than gravity flow overflow to wing? I would appreciate any comments on line size.. or am I being to engineered? jw
Joe. E. Wallace jwallacep51 at gmail.com > On Aug 8, 2015, at 16:27, brian.kraut--- via KRnet <krnet at list.krnet.org> > wrote: > > Keep those Facet pumps low. They don't do good with pulling a prime > uphill which I learned on my aux wing tanks transferring to the header > tank. I originally had my pump mounted on the back side of the header > tank, but I moved it down low on a doubler on the front of the spar when > I had an issue with it not sucking up a prime. > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: KR> fuel line through the spar caps? > From: ppaulvsk via KRnet <krnet at list.krnet.org> > Date: Fri, August 07, 2015 11:27 am > To: KRnet <krnet at list.krnet.org> > Cc: ppaulvsk <ppaulvsk at aol.com> > > I wasn't planning on going to the spar cap. Just the center of the web. > After the holes are drilled. I'm putting a 1/8" plywood doubler over > them.Then run the tube threw it. Like what Mark said. My goal is to keep > the fuek coming out of the tanks in the same plain befor going though > the firewall to the duel Facet pumps. Larry, there is a horizontal brace > on the back side of the spar and my floor covers the front side. Like > most KR-2S > > _______________________________________________ > Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search. > To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html > see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change > options
