Fraser McGregor, Please contact me of net via email k...@bigpond.com

I've just bought a KR2 in Brisbane

Barry Kruyssen

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Fraser McGregor" <fa.mcgre...@qut.edu.au>
To: "KR builders and pilots" <kr...@mylist.net>
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: KR>Building a KR2


> Thanks Colin for that advice - yes I have been looking at the web sites -
> all very interesting.  As I live in Australia - also known as God's Great
> Garden - I might just have to pass on the gathering, but thanks for the
> offer - the old C172 won't go that far.
>
> I just wish all you guys would give your measurements in real terms, ie
> millimeters, kg, Newtons, etc, instead of these ancient english imperial
> things.  Pity you didn' t throw the imperial system overboard with the tea
> in Boston, all those years ago!  Makes my head ache, having to do the
> conversions.  (Please note - last para is my attempt at humour :-))
>
> At 09:39 AM 7/09/2003 -0400, you wrote:
> >Fraser,
> >You said:
> >Hi - I am new to this net, so bear with me please!  I am looking for a
> >suitable plane to build, and the KR2 of KR2S seems to fit the bill for me
> >so far.  Do the current plans available have these later refinements and
> >improvements that you mentioned,?  If not, is there a source of these, or
> >is it simply that these refinements etc are what individuals have done to
> >their planes while building them?
> >To answer your question, please do not think that I am the authority
here,
> >as there are some long time builders that have way more knowledge of this
> >aircraft than I. I guess I just tend to be alittle more vocal! HaHa.
> >The KR2 is a wonderful airplane, but a new builder should not consider
the
> >older KR2 without including the "S" supplement. If you will "cruise" over
> >to the KRnet construction site and search through the archives, you will
> >find a HUGE amount of information on modifications and improvements that
> >builders have made to this little plane.  Also, lots of builders' sites
> >have great ideas and improvements that they have made to overcome
> >different building challenges that they have experienced.  The KR2S plans
> >are reported to be the clearest and easiest to use, as well as the
> >supplement including the refinements of re-enforced firewall for larger
> >powerplants, and longer fuselage.  Mark Langford's site talks about
> >several good refinements and hiper links you to other sources of
> >additional studies and mods.  The original KR2 had a neat idea for
> >retracts, but over the years, virtually every builder with them has done
> >away with them in favor of a less drag inducing well faired fixed gear,
or
> >some other version of retract (Loehle Replicas has a good system that
> >swing inboard, but requires alot of work to fit onto a KR2).  Also you
> >cannot forget to put the gear down on fixed gear!  I had a student
> >recently, over 300 hour pilot take me down an instrument approach in a
> >twin engine aircraft and forget the landing gear, all the way down to 400
> >AGL when I took over and lowered the gear. If he had been solo that would
> >have been an expensive mistake.
> >What I recommend is for you to take several afternoons and read through
> >the different builder websites and finished aircraft, and learn all you
> >can from the ones out there building, or flying.  They know what is
> >working for them, and will save you literally hundreds of hours trying to
> >solve problems. Then when you have questions, and you can't find the
> >answer in the archives, ask it here.  Go to the Gathering this year and
> >look at the KR2, and KR2S up close and compare.  I am told the materials
> >cost is virtually the same, and you will be much happier with the plane
> >when it is complete.  Any other builders' thoughts please don't hesitate
> >to chime in here.... :)
> >
> >
> >Colin Rainey KR2(td)
> >crain...@cfl.rr.com
> >Sanford, Florida
> >FLY SAFE!!!!_______________________________________________
> >see KRnet list details at http://www.krnet.org/instructions.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> see KRnet list details at http://www.krnet.org/instructions.html
>

Reply via email to