It looks like the original post was bounced by the net. Probably because the link was not acceptable.

If you Google 'FAA weight and balance handbook' you should get a link to the free download of the FAA 8083-1 PDF - apparently it is out of print. It was just below the ads listings when I did it.

-------------------------------------------------------

We could always check:

[original link removed by sender]

Mark W.

N952MW (res).

On 7/11/2022 1:47 PM, MS wrote:


On Monday, July 11, 2022 at 09:25:33 AM PDT, Craig Williams <cr...@kr2seafury.com> wrote:


I was using Marks example of 15-30% of MAC.  This looks to already have the AFT 2" removed from the calculation so with MAC being 42.66 it calculated out to 6.4-12.8" aft of the LE.

Craig

***********************

Not necessarily a bad thing, depending.  See how it feels in the air before you start tearing things apart.  An aft CG unloads the tail and reduces drag, increases speed and range. Also increases sensitivity on the stick and (they say) increases stall speed a tad - this feature can cause unexpected and sudden breaks but it you keep a margin of speed as you get a feel for the plane, you may find that you like your aft CG.  I'm always flying with an aft CG since I've usually got the baggage area loaded with tools and travel stuff, computer, clothes, etc. It's never been a problem and actually helps with making a three-pointer landing if winds are calm or straight against you.

This "aft CG" question can be a force for good or evil.  Take it up and see how it flies before you make any drastic decisions.  You may like it just fine.  If built correctly, the KR wing is very forgiving.

Mike Stirewalt
KSEE

-- 
KRnet mailing list
KRnet@list.krnet.org
https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet

Reply via email to