April Chin wrote: > On a related note regarding the builtins in ksh93... > I think we want to integrate ksh93 without the builtins > which have Solaris binaries but are not Solaris ksh builtins, at least > not initially. Will ksh93 users be depending on builtins for getconf, > printf, sleep, etc. in Solaris?
One specific issue with sleep is its granularity. With ksh93 I expect sleep to support sub-second resolution. It's one of the reasons for chosing ksh93. Regards, Henk
