Glenn Fowler <gsf at research.att.com> wrote:
> well as it pertains to the ast ksh source someone will have to
> care a whit if they expect to whittle out the inter-system
> portability infrastructure (which has evolved over almost 30 years)
> and still expect to get equivalent binaries with the whittled
> down build vs. the automatically configured build
Are you sure your system is as potable as it claims?
AFAIK, it needs a ksh binary in order to be able to build ksh.
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
