Glenn Fowler <gsf at research.att.com> wrote:
> > Are you sure your system is as potable as it claims?
>
> yes -- see http://www.research.att.com/sw/download/arch.html for
> a list architectures we have access to that build without
> manual intervention -- there may be others but we don't
> keep track of that
>
> > AFAIK, it needs a ksh binary in order to be able to build ksh.
>
> no it doesn't
> it biases towards ksh if one is available
> but works with any Bourne descendant
I did not dot it myself but the Student who did try to compile
ksh93 for SchilliX dod tell me that the scripts did not work with /bin/sh
so for the first attempt, he did change /bin/sh to /bin/bash
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
