Roland Mainz <roland.mainz at nrubsig.org> wrote:
> Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
> > we seem to have gotten ratholed into which-make-style-is-better wars.
>
> ;-(
>
> > When it comes to integration into the solaris build process, there are
> > essentially only two credible options:
> >
> > 1) construct a new set of solaris-style makefiles and discard the
> > originals.
>
> This may be preferred if we want to change the filesystem layout of the
> ksh93 distribution and move stuff like "libast" (same was done with
> openssl&co.) to on/usr/src/lib/ (see
> http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/on/usr/src/lib/). AFAIK in that
> case we have to create own own Makfiles.
How many of the AT&T sources do you like to integrate into OpenSolaris?
Do you like to add everything?
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
