* Yang, Sheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> + /* Though spec said the state of 8254 is undefined after power-up,
> + * seems some tricky OS like Windows XP depends on IRQ0 interrupt
> + * when booting up.
> + * So here setting initialize rate for it, and not a specific number */
another silly style nit, the canonical comment style is:
> + /*
> + * Though spec said the state of 8254 is undefined after power-up,
> + * seems some tricky OS like Windows XP depends on IRQ0 interrupt
> + * when booting up.
> + * So here setting initialize rate for it, and not a specific number
> + */
we are standardizing on that in other areas of arch/x86 and KVM uses
that too.
but your patch looks good otherwise :)
/me goes back into lurker mode
Ingo
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
