* Yang, Sheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > another silly style nit, the canonical comment style is:
> > > + /*
> > > + * Though spec said the state of 8254 is undefined after power-up,
> > > + * seems some tricky OS like Windows XP depends on IRQ0 interrupt
> > > + * when booting up.
> > > + * So here setting initialize rate for it, and not a specific number
> > > + */
> >
> > we are standardizing on that in other areas of arch/x86 and KVM uses
> > that too.
>
> ... Seems I still can't fully depend on script/checkpatch.pl to
> correct my coding style error...
yeah - checkpatch.pl tries to err on the side of caution, so that it can
be used in automated setups. (And your patch was pretty clean already so
this was mostly a sidenote.)
Ingo
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
