Amit Shah wrote:
* On Friday 22 Aug 2008 23:51:15 Avi Kivity wrote:
Amit Shah wrote:
The following two patches contain VT-d support for device assignment
for KVM guests.

The first patch contains the changes that are required to the generic
VT-d code.

The second patch contains the changes to KVM.

I've updated the 2nd patch to use VT-d only when requested by a parameter
on the command line, making it easier to support iommu with pvdma and
multiple iommu types.

The command line currently should be invoked as:

-pcidevice dev=00:13.0,vtd=on
You mean, iommu=on.

I did mean vtd=on, since we'll also have AMD's iommu implementation here.

So something like:

-pcidevice dev=00:13.0,vtd=on,pvdma=on

or

-pcidevice dev=00:13.0,amd-iommu=on,pvdma=on

or do you mean we should autodetect which IOMMU we have and then select the appropriate one instead of bothering the user with it? Hmm, that seems a better UI and also such startup scripts can be ported across architectures.


Yes of course. Note there's no need for kvm to autodetect the iommu either; I won't let the amd iommu in without a proper abstraction via an iommu api.

Or rather

  dma=iommu
  dma=none (1:1 mapping, or dma-less devices, or I'm Feeling Lucky)
  dma=cooperative (paravirt)

This looks much better!

Once we have KVM_CAP_VTD,  KVM_CAP_AMD_IOMMU and KVM_CAP_PVDMA,

Why KVM_CAP_VTD and KVM_CAP_AMD_IOMMU? Do they actually have differences? if so, the capabilities should report the differences as features, not as vendor identifiers.

dma=iommu means use either of VTD or AMD, whichever one is available
dma=none means I'm feeling lucky

PVDMA will automatically get used if the guest has PVDMA support compiled in. Enabling/disabling pvdma would be a guest option rather than a host option, I think (host only exposes CAP_PVDMA).

Is this ok?

So long as there is no potential for performance or security impact, having pvdma turned on automatically is better. We could still have dma=noparavirt to disable it.

--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to