On 12/09/2010 05:13 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Avi Kivity<a...@redhat.com> writes:
> On 12/06/2010 06:43 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 18:34 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> > On 12/06/2010 06:21 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> > > v2:
>> > > - Reimplement 2/5 to remove more cruft
>> > >
>> > > v1:
>> > >
>> > > Now that we've got PCI capabilities cleaned up and device assignment
>> > > using them, we can add more capabilities to be guest visible. This
>> > > adds minimal PCI Express, PCI-X, and Power Management, along with
>> > > direct passthrough Vital Product Data and Vendor Specific
capabilities.
>> > > With this, devices like tg3, bnx2, vxge, and potentially quite a few
>> > > others that didn't work previously should be happier. Thanks,
>> > >
>> >
>> > Applied, thanks. EFAULT is not the best error return, though.
>>
>> Do you prefer EBUSY? Bad address seemed appropriate here, but I'm not
>> attached to it. Feel free to change it, or I can send a follow-up.
>> Thanks,
>
> EBUSY isn't descriptive either, but EFAULT is wrong, it's the syscall
> equivalent of a SEGV, which hasn't happened here. How I hate errno.h.
EEXIST? EINVAL?
I guess EINVAL is best ("go read the source code").
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
