Hello, 2011/10/16 Olivier Hallot <olivier.hal...@documentfoundation.org>: > Exactly... for what it worth, leting the software define shortcuts may lead > do inconsistencies among versions and disrupt users already used to the old > shortcuts. I expect some rants from them.
I agree. > > Unfortunately, the best way is to manually define each shortcut, dialog by > dialog. > True. > Now, since this is very cumbersome, a tool to map each dialog with pootle > file/section is a must. > We would need a map, for example: srchdlg.src#RID_SVXDLG_SEARCH.CB_WHOLE_WORDS.checkbox.text <--> (Writer|Basic|Draw|Impress) Edit - Find & Replace... I have no idea how to extract this information from the source code. Key IDs help a bit I think, at least you know what to modify in Pootle when you see it on the UI. By the way, it is not a disaster when there are duplicated shortcuts in a menu or in a dialog. Even English UI has duplicates shourcuts, for example in Writer, File menu, Sen~d and Export as P~DF or Digital Signatu~res and P~rinter settings. These menu items are still accessible from the keyboard, the shortcut key toggles between the two items, also arrow keys can be used. For dialogs it works similarly, and user also can tab thorough the items. Best regards, Andras -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
