Hi Yury, On Wednesday, 2012-01-18 09:24:42 +0200, Yury Tarasievich wrote:
> Of course, if the functionality is there, anyway, and has to be > "fed" something, even such not-quite-intuitive forms will do. It doesn't _have_ to be fed something, without a specific pattern only input of a full date (here D.M.Y) yields a date and input of incomplete dates will not be possible. > *In fact, I hereby request "D/M/" and "D.M." for the be_BY, please.* No problem, would do, but ... > But it would be ever so better to have a possibility for computer to > not second-guess at all, as such guesses might even be culturally > irrelevant. ... I'm confused now, does be-BY want incomplete date patterns, yes or no? Eike -- LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. GnuPG key 0x293C05FD : 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3 9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
