El vie, 02-05-2008 a las 08:15 +0200, Roland Weber escribió: > Roland Weber wrote: > >> Are there any additional criteria on the labs side for being promoted? > >> Most probably, there would be a vote. Anything else? > > > > The vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] might suffice. > > The Labs Bylaws _seem_ to require a vote by > the Labs PMC to change the state of a lab: > http://labs.apache.org/bylaws.html > > > The Labs PMC can change the state of a lab with a majority vote. > > On the other hand, the same Bylaws say: > > The lab PI can change the state of the lab from active > > to idle and back at any time, just by updating the descriptor. > > So not all state changes require a vote here. I'd say that > the state change to Promoted is one of those that don't > require a vote by the Labs PMC. In fact, it is a state change > that cannot even be decided by the Labs PMC, since the > Incubator PMC must accept the podling in the first place. > Once that happens, it makes no sense to keep the lab in > any other state than Promoted. > > Just my 0.02€, > Roland >
+1. Add my (binding) 0.02€ too :) I don't think adding additional bureaucracy helps here: once a lab gets accepted for incubation (goes to search for a community) it should get promoted. The only caveat I can foresee is the need for a rollback if incubation fails but the author wants to keep with it (highly unlikely event, I guess we can't just "restart" the lab). Regards Santiago > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Santiago Gala http://memojo.com/~sgala/blog/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
