Martin Cooper wrote:
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Roland Weber wrote:
Are there any additional criteria on the labs side for being promoted?
Most probably, there would be a vote. Anything else?
The vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] might suffice.
The Labs Bylaws _seem_ to require a vote by
the Labs PMC to change the state of a lab:
http://labs.apache.org/bylaws.html
The Labs PMC can change the state of a lab with a majority vote.
On the other hand, the same Bylaws say:
The lab PI can change the state of the lab from active
to idle and back at any time, just by updating the descriptor.
So not all state changes require a vote here. I'd say that
the state change to Promoted is one of those that don't
require a vote by the Labs PMC.
I disagree. It's a question of oversight, which is what the PMC does. IMO
there needs to be a PMC vote if the status of oversight is to change, and
Promotion, as I understand it, is exactly that. Once promoted, a lab is no
longer under the purview of the Labs PMC, and it should require a PMC vote
to make such a change.
I agree with Roland and Santiago, if a lab gets accepted by the
incubator then I don't see any point in holding a vote here.
Niall
--
Martin Cooper
In fact, it is a state change
that cannot even be decided by the Labs PMC, since the
Incubator PMC must accept the podling in the first place.
Once that happens, it makes no sense to keep the lab in
any other state than Promoted.
Just my 0.02€,
Roland
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
