On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Stephen Paul Weber<[email protected]> wrote: > Somebody claiming to be (``-_-´´) -- Fernando wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Stephen Paul >> Weber<[email protected]> wrote: >> You wont find any one raging against limits more then me, *but* that >> example of yours takes 10 chars, and we are talking about µblogging >> (<140). > > Silly person. The chars are not part of the message. They will not count > towards your 140. The will not display as part of the message.
Tell that to all 3rd party apps that (stupidlly, i agree) *force* a limit on the outgoing messages. (gwibber i'm looking at you :) ) Also now picture this: you reply to a message where #ReplyIDCode + message is 140 chars. now the system replaces #ReplyIDCode with @HiMyNickIsTooLong nick. What do you think will/should happen? -- BUGabundo :o) (``-_-´´) Linux user #443786 GPG key 1024D/A1784EBB _______________________________________________ Laconica-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.laconi.ca/mailman/listinfo/laconica-dev
