Re: L&I Whitewater Witness Goes on Trial in Arkansas

[Ronald Helm]

"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


I am a little puzzled here.  I don't think that her refusal to testify
necessarily
>implies she is hiding something, nor that she is a masochist.  Isn't that
rather a
>leap in logic??

This only shows a lack of logic on your part. Whether Clinton is innocent or
guilty does not matter.  If he were innocent, she would gladly tell the
truth, get out of jail, not perjure herself and go on to write her book.  If
Clinton is guilty, and she does not wish to implicate him, she refuses to
testify, is charged with contempt and goes to jail.  Quite simple, very
logical, unless your logic is completely blinded by your insistence that
Clinton has done nothing wrong.

Ron

 99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues