Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
William J. Foristal wrote:
> Hi Jackie,
>
> As usual, your perception of issues transcends the bias and prejudice of
> others. :) Clearly it seems that if McDougal was refusing to answer
> questions in order to hide Clinton's guilt, then Clinton would have
> issued a presidential pardon to her to take the heat off of her. He
> could simply say that this woman is being persecuted as a political
> prisoner and this was against all the principles that our judicial system
> stands for. If he is not guilty, however, he does not need to take any
> chances with public sentiment and opinion that might be turned against
> him if he issues a pardon to McDougal.
>
> Bill
Hi Bill
And here I thought I was more difficult to understand than Kant : ). I just
wonder how people can figure she is getting such a great payoff later--prison
is no picnic, usually, for anyone. And I would imagine it is harder for
someone that has been used to somewhat more in life than the average
prisoner. Besides, by the time she gets out, I don't imagine Clinton would
have the money for the big payoff as people seem to think. Oops, they just
called Susan "Joan of Arc" on TV, they must be reading our posts (teehee).
jackief
>
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
> Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
> Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
--
In the sociology room the children learn
that even dreams are colored by your perspective
I toss and turn all night. Theresa Burns, "The Sociology Room"
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
