"Joan Moyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hello Sue,
Perhaps she thought having many babies would guarantee her financial help
and she would have financial support for many years. What's the Dr.'s
excuse? Why was a woman with no husband and no means of support
impregnated not only with the possibility of one child but of many? I
think the Dr. has much to answer for. It would be just if he had to
support those costs he brought about.
Joan
----------
> From: Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: L&I Woman 55 gives birth to 4 babies
> Date: Friday, April 24, 1998 1:26 PM
>
> Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Hi Vi:
>
> It's nuts. IMO
>
> But it was her alone, she doesn't have a husband or anything, and she
> paid cash for the procedure. So they probably didn't know that there
> was going to be those other problems.
>
> What I don't understand though is with her financial problems, the
> medical problems that she could face, and the jeopardy to the babies,
> both now and in the future, why didn't she have some of the fetus's
> aborted.
>
> Well it looks like you and I, as well as other California taxpayers will
> be paying for this for a long time. :( Just what California needed.
> Can't afford books for our school children, but we can pay for something
> like this.
>
> Not to mention the suffering that these kids will probably endure.
>
> Sue
> > Hi Sue,
> >
> > What's even crazier is that San Francisco doctors would agree to
provide
> > invitro-fertilization to a couple who not only cannot take care of
> > themselves in all probability, but with four more mouths to feed, leave
> > it up to the California tax payers to pick up the medical tab.
>
>
>
> --
> Two rules in life:
>
> 1. Don't tell people everything you know.
> 2.
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
