"Joan Moyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hello Bill,
Maybe so. It would certainly be a more comfortable place to live. :)
Joan
----------
> From: William J. Foristal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: L&I Back Home
> Date: Monday, April 27, 1998 5:07 PM
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
>
>
> Hi Joan,
>
> I guess we should be encouraged by the progress that HAS been made over
> the past twenty to thirty years. I think as long as everyone continues
> to fight for the elimination of racial prejudice and discrimination that
> progress will continue. But I doubt if we will ever see the end of it
> completely. Perhaps future generations will.
>
> Bill
>
>
> On Mon, 27 Apr 1998 13:21:52 -0400 "Joan Moyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >"Joan Moyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >Hello Bill,
> >
> >Despite the fact that old habits die slowly, as they say :),
> >professional
> >behavior must prevail. I don't recall hearing of the racist comments
> >made
> >on the police radio, but there is no room for such comments over the
> >radio
> >or anywhere in the workplace. Can't control people in their homes or
> >other
> >private areas. I guess education and being raised without hatred is
> >part
> >of the answer, but so much racism within all races still exists, I
> >don't
> >see a lot of hope in the near future. However, it can be controlled
> >on the
> >job.
> >
> > Joan
> >
> >----------
> >> From: William J. Foristal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: Re: L&I Back Home
> >> Date: Monday, April 27, 1998 12:08 PM
> >>
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
> >>
> >>
> >> HI Joan,
> >>
> >> I agree with you completely! There was also some disturbing
> >evidence
> >> that showed some racist comments over the police radio. This is the
> >kind
> >> of foolish behavior that must be eliminated also.
> >>
> >> Bill
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, 26 Apr 1998 13:57:44 -0400 "Joan Moyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >writes:
> >> >"Joan Moyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Hello Kathy,
> >> >
> >> >I recall your post about LAPD training. Hopefully it has improved
> >> >with
> >> >time and with the exposure that police force has received. I
> >believe
> >> >when
> >> >it is necessary to subdue a prisoner attempting to avoid capture or
> >to
> >> >escape or to prevent that individual from harming someone, then
> >force
> >> >must
> >> >be used. I believe King needed to be subdued as he did not succumb
> >to
> >> >capture willingly. The line appears to be at what point King was
> >> >under
> >> >control and how much physical force was still used when it was
> >> >unnecessary.
> >> > I believe there was abuse and that was wrong. On the other hand,
> >I
> >> >do not
> >> >excuse King for the part he played. Had he not behaved as he did,
> >a
> >> >high
> >> >speed chase would have been avoided and had he not resisted arrest
> >and
> >> >attacked the officers, no force would have been necessary.
> >However, I
> >> >certainly distinguish between necessary force and abuse. Abuse is
> >not
> >> >acceptable on the part of the criminal or the police. I understand
> >
> >> >your
> >> >point. :)
> >> >
> >> > Joan
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >----------
> >> >> From: Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> Subject: Re: L&I Back Home
> >> >> Date: Sunday, April 26, 1998 1:16 PM
> >> >>
> >> >> Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi Joan :)
> >> >>
> >> >> I disagree with you :) If you remember a couple of years ago I
> >> >stated
> >> >> that the problem was in the training of the LAPD according to
> >their
> >> >> training they were following the procedures used at the time.
> >OTOH
> >> >that
> >> >> does not lift the responsibility off of the officers and what
> >they
> >> >did,
> >> >> nor does it lift the responsibility off of RK and what he did.
> >> >>
> >> >> Joan Moyer wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > "Joan Moyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Hello Vi,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Glad the surgery was successful. I had a house on the market
> >once
> >> >for
> >> >a
> >> >> > year and it was a real worry since I had bought another. Glad
> >to
> >> >read
> >> >your
> >> >> > posts. We are probably the only 2 who believe King had to be
> >> >subdued
> >> >and
> >> >> > the officers were not totally at fault.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Joan
> >> >> >
> >> >> --
> >> >> Kathy E
> >> >> "I can only please one person a day, today is NOT your day, and
> >> >tomorrow
> >> >> isn't looking too good for you either"
> >> >> http://members.delphi.com/kathylaw/ Law & Issues Mailing List
> >> >> http://pw1.netcom.com/~kathye/rodeo.html - Cowboy Histories
> >> >> http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Lobby/2990/law.htm Crime
> >> >photo's
> >> >>
> >> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe
> >law-issues
> >> >
> >> >Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >_____________________________________________________________________
> >> You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
> >> Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
> >> Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
> >>
> >>
> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
> >
> >Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
> >
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
> Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
> Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
>
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
