Mattias Gaertner schrieb: >> Then no extra documentation is needed.[...] > How to distinguish an item that needs documentation and an > item that does not need documentation?
Well, if the current documentation just repeats the name (with fillwords) then it is useless IMO and should be deleted. But I didn't mean that in these cases documentation is not *needed*, just the opposite. I think that all functions/methods/language constructs/types/... should be documented. It's just that the *current* documenation is often useless because of its simple name repeat. The important information about side effects and internal structure is missing often.
-- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
