On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:12:10 +0100 Lukasz Sokol <el.es...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > > On 11/06/2013 16:54, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > [...] > > No, it is by design. > > The IDE options are the defaults for all projects. > > The project options are more specific, so they must come after that. > > The session options are for the users own experiments. That's why they > > come last. > > > > >From looking at the above description I am thinking, > how would that look if the order was exactly the reverse: Both directions are ok. What order a user prefers depends on what he is used to. Maybe a toggle can be added to switch direction. > [...] > Also, a quick way to propagate 1<>2<>3 (e.g. button(s): Copy/Move to/from > project options, > between 1 and 2, Copy/Move to/from IDE options - between 2 and 3, that of > course, > only those options that do make sense being propagated around, and with > indication, > i.e. to grey out those that don't have any effect due to being overriden > (with a hint as to > why and where, too) ) comes to mind ;) You can use the up, down buttons to move options. Maybe a "copy option", and "insert option" can be added to the popup menu. Mattias -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
