On 04/10/2014 05:33 PM, Martin Frb wrote:
That would work. (and I would accept a patch (adding an option / not
making it mandatory)
Sounds nice to me, especially regarding that gdbserver is not that
"common" and hence not easily to come by in some cases.
But at this stage, I prefer the async solution.
I see.
Did you test, if the gdb (without gdbserver) you intend to use
supports async?
In fact we have not been able to find/create a remote-gdb gdbserver pair
with an effort low enough to recommend to anybody.
-Michael
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
