Giuliano Colla schrieb:
>> Isn't that where the dead lock occurs? Suppose Thr1 has just called
>> Synchronize and is waiting until the main thread has executed the
>> synchronized method, it won't terminate, because you have suppended
>> the main thread by waiting for Thr1 to terminate.
>>
> I'm afraid you're right.
> A really bullet proof way to terminate an application when even a single
> thread using synchronize is running is far from straightforward, and
> hard to generalize.
> For this reason, and many others, I consider the synchronize method just
> a hack.
Terminating threads is always not easy and hard to generalize.
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
